Charged Terminal Rundown revised

June 24, 2010 from R3X Blog

Before this procedure is taken up, all significant incidents that could show up along the way should be run out first.

The Charged Terminal R/D works quite well as originally written up, and has given impressive E.P.s like turning enemies into friends, even though only one of the parties received it. There is, however, a more thorough way of addressing charged terminals. That is done by running the incidents related to the charged terminal the same way one would any incident. For instance, one would start by running through the normal R3R style scan: "Move to the beginning of that period of time" "From that point forward to...(whatever chunk of time the Pc can have)..., with regards to (charged terminal), move through to the end of that period of time." After that has been thoroughly flattened, with the help of 6-directions, hopefully, the auditor would then move on to running the Special Attention commands. For instance, "From that point forward to...(time period)..., with regards to (charged terminal), and with particular attention to anything hidden, suppressed, overwhelming, invisible, occluded, repressed or has unconsciousness, move through to the end of that period of time".

This pattern is kept up until all the special attention commands are exhausted. Afterwards, the 4 flows can still be employed. There shouldn't be much charge left there if any after the SA commands have been run, but then the four flows do address a different aspect of case, so there should be something additional left to run out.

The challenge comes with the shock moment handling from the multiple viewpoints. First, how does one run such a long period of time from the various viewpoints involved, and secondly, what if there are no shocks as such to be run? Well, first of all, I will hat the Pc up by telling him that 1. he is capable of assuming all the viewpoints relevant to the incidents involving that terminal, and 2, the command will imply that from the relevant viewpoints, he will be viewing the relevant incidents or shocks. An alternate way of running this part of the procedure is by running the incidents rather than shocks from the various viewpoints. Actually, I find that simpler and as workable. The main goal is to get the Pc to flatten his charge on the viewpoints by assuming them.

The command for the "everyone else who is relevant" viewpoint is "From the viewpoints of all the other relevant terminals, move through that series of incidents from beginning to end."

The auditor has a few options with regards to the shock moments. 1. He can continue the shock moment part of the procedure, in which case he would run each person through the "series of shocks", after which the 4 flows would be taken up. 2. He can do the same thing but run "incidents" rather than "shock moments". 3. he can do the same as 1 but run himself through the series of shocks and run each other individual viewpoint through the "series of incidents" 4. Or he can skip the whole thing and simply move on to running the 4 flows as it's done in the original charged terminal r/d.

I haven't arrived at a final way of doing it as I gauge the needs of each individual Pc at the time.

It seems that the bulk of gains from this procedure is gotten not from the scanning of the time period itself, but rather in the fact that it picks up hidden and often very charged incidents that would not normally show up in other ways. In doing this procedure there may be several detours taken along the way. For this reason I have devised an orderly system of procedure and notation for doing this. I will take up the admin end of that in a separate bulletin. The system is done in a similar way as word chains are taken up in doing word clearing, particularly Method 1. For instance, let's say in scanning birth to 10 years old with regards to the body/GE, a number of significant incidents show up. The auditor would leave the scanning of the period at a flat point and take up the most significant incident that comes up, running that with R3X procedure. If in doing this something else comes up, such as a blank area that needs opening up, the auditor then would run the incident to a flat point and then leave it in favor of running the blank area until it is sufficiently opened up, after which the auditor would resume running the original incident with the rest of the R3X procedure. After that incident is completed, the next incident in importance would be taken up and run out. This is done until all incidents of significance are run out, after which the auditor would resume with the charged terminal rundown.

Who or what is run on this procedure? The auditor may be tempted to take up later on the chain people like recent relationships. Well, the present time relationship partner may be called for, but if it isn't pressing, then the best place to start would be with people the Pc knew at the beginning of his life, including the pre-natal area. This would include mother, father, siblings, and especially body/GE/life force. In fact, I prefer to start out with running out the lifetime with regards to the body/GE/life force. (The auditor might prefer to use the term "body and GE" with some clients and "body and its life force" with other, less scientologically oriented clients.)

How large a segment of time should the auditor take up? That all depends on the circumstances. Different Pcs differ in their capacities to run things and severity of charged past track. If I were to audit a Pc on the "body/GE" as a charged terminal, I might start with conception to birth with an advanced client, and with maybe birth to, say, 1 year old with a less advanced client. I could then gauge from there how to proceed next.

In running these earlier parts of this lifetime, liberal use should be made of the auditor tools such as imaginary incident running. The repeater technique should be used sparingly, and only run with regards to a particular incident in which it comes up, and only until a release has been achieved on it.

If one wants to resolve chronic conditions, whether physical, emotional or mental, this is the best way I've found. No need to into G.E. past track. No urgent need to go into theta whole track. After this lifetime is straightened out, then one can spend more time in resolving the recent between-lives, recent 3 or 4 lifetimes, and then whole track items for spiritual advancement.

Robert